Artifacts

The Work Behind the Thinking

The artifacts presented here offer a closer look at how we approach complex urban questions—from framing the problem and identifying the right evidence to connecting spatial, transportation, development, and policy considerations. Each example reflects a different analytical challenge, but together they demonstrate a consistent approach: disciplined inquiry, transparent reasoning, and work designed to turn complex information into insights that are clear, credible, and useful.

Artifacts

Most Recent Works
Washington, DC Structural Urban Form Reference Map showing the Structural Core and separate structural areasOpen full-resolution PDF
PublishedCartographic reference mapv1.5

Washington, DC Structural Urban Form Reference Map

Maps Washington, DC’s Structural Core and three named separate structural areas—Georgetown, L’Enfant Plaza–Southwest Waterfront, and Navy Yard–Capitol Riverfront—using all-building Structural Intensity, not population density, with component measurements and regional reference geography.

Structural Intensity · Spatial AnalysisDOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22695453
Open full-resolution PDF
Philadelphia, PA Structural Urban Form Reference Map showing the Structural Core, Center City–South Philadelphia, and West Philadelphia structural areasOpen full-resolution PDF
PublishedCartographic reference mapv1.2

Philadelphia, PA Structural Urban Form Reference Map

Maps Philadelphia’s Structural Core and separate major structural areas using the fixed all-building Structural Intensity method.

Although the Center City–South Philadelphia Structural Area contains the city’s established business district, the largest contiguous component of qualifying SI cells—the Structural Core—extends across much of North Philadelphia into the lower Northeast.

Structural Intensity · Spatial AnalysisDOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22699970
Open full-resolution PDF
Comparison panels showing modeled occupancy and transportation changes for the 450 Fifth Street NW conversion, including differences from office workforce benchmarks and modeled weekday and peak-period tripsOpen full-resolution figure
PublishedDevelopment scenario analysisv1.0

Modeled Effects of Office-to-Residential Conversion

Examines how converting a downtown office building to residential use changes modeled occupancy and transportation activity relative to historical and contemporary office benchmarks, distinguishing added floor area from occupied capacity and transit-generating intensity.

Downtown Adaptation · Development AnalysisDOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22261965
Open full-resolution figure
Six-step exclusion-first policy evaluation framework moving from agreed protected interests and mapped exclusions through legally eligible residual geography, selective-height scenarios, comparable impact measures, and a reconciled institutional findingOpen full-resolution figure
PublishedPolicy evaluation frameworkv1.0

Exclusion-First Framework for Selective-Height Policy Analysis

Reconstructs the joint analytical sequence needed to evaluate selective height changes: agree on protected interests, map exclusions, identify legally eligible residual geography, test bounded height scenarios through comparable visual, capacity, economic, and urban-form measures, and produce a reconciled institutional finding.

Downtown Adaptation · Policy AnalysisDOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22310280
Open full-resolution figure
Bar chart comparing the share of urban-district land and qualifying Structural Intensity cells within two or more official station pedsheds across Washington-area downtown systems and urban districtsOpen full-resolution figure
PublishedTransit analysisv1.0

Urban-District Multiple-Station Access Comparison

Compares the share of urban-district land and qualifying Structural Intensity cells within two or more official WMATA Metrorail station pedsheds, revealing the exceptional depth of overlapping access in Traditional Downtown DC.